How to manage ad creatives and campaigns across several ad networks

The manual way, and where it breaks

• Performance lives in separate dashboards, so comparing networks means exporting and stitching spreadsheets.
• A winning creative on one network reaches the others days later, after someone re-uploads and rebuilds it by hand.
• Plans are made in one place and carried out in six, so mistakes and drift creep in.
• Nobody has a single record of what changed where, who asked for it and who approved it.
• Each new title or network adds work to the same small team.

What to automate first

• One place to ask questions about performance across every network, in plain language.
• Answers you can see: charts, tables and creative previews, not walls of numbers.
• Changes prepared for every network at once, from one agreed plan.
• An approval step before anything goes live, and a log of every action.
• Automation per network for the repetitive work: uploading, grouping, testing and rotating creatives.

How Pozeidon does it

• Analyses performance across Meta, Google Ads, AppLovin, Unity, Mintegral, TikTok and your other media channels in one conversation.
• Answers with interactive charts, tables and creative previews.
• Brainstorms with you, agrees on a plan, and prepares the changes on each network.
• Waits for your approval before anything goes live, and records who asked, who approved and when.
• Carries out the work through its Creative Copilots, one per network.
• Learns how your team works, so one UA manager can run many titles on many networks.

What automation changes

Playvalve, a Barcelona-based mobile game publisher, used Bubbleye's creative and spend automation to grow paid user acquisition with the same two-person UA team: about 200,000 more installs a month (a 100% increase), ten times as many campaigns run and optimized, the equivalent of five extra UA managers, and spend up to 11x on some networks, in under six months compared with the six months before.

Frequent questions